Skip to content

You are here:
Will NOT Allow Domains to Expire | Print |  E-mail
User Rating: / 4
PoorBest 
Monday, 05 March 2007
I've recently received word of a conference call between all the registries, ICANN and Registefly that had taken place on Friday, March 3.  During the call, ICANN reportedly told the registries that any of Registerfly Domains will NOT be allowed to expire, go into redemption, or be deleted during the next 30-35 days.  I would expect official news and documentation regarding this on Monday.
Comments
Add NewSearchRSS
napoleon Registered | 2007-03-05 00:09:30
Has anyone other than myself noticed that enom owns the parking advertising pages that registerfly still has up for the supposed expired domain names they have taken from us? Have a look for yourself at name-services.com Looks familiar doesn't it? It's owned by enom.
My domains were on auto renewal but registerfly took them anyway. enom told me they weren't under their name but most still are. They wouldn't push them through as they claim.
mopey Registered | 2007-03-05 01:25:12
hmmm... are we seeing some real action taking place now? that is good! Too much talk in the past. A solid step to prevent any more losses is good.
debstl - Same Problem as Napoleon IP:70.242.141.173 | 2007-03-05 01:44:45
My domain was also set for auto renewel, but they never did it. And they charged my credit card when I tried to renew it manually. Now they've let it expire and put up one of those parking pages. Enom claims they aren't the registrar even though a whois search has them listed as the registrar and support@unifiednames-inc.com as the administrative contact.
sysadmin Registered | 2007-03-05 02:21:13
It could be because RF is not updating their whois info/db. I can't transfer my domains because they have ProtectFly enabled and even though I disabled them and am not using cached whois results, I still see the anonymous info and/or glenn@registerfly.com as the owner. I hope this whole scenario makes ICANN reconsider it's policy in dealing with registrars because this is costing people their businesses and most valuable, longest held domain names.
estebanv - sysadmin please contact me Registered | 2007-03-05 10:49:45
I have the exact same problems I have just contacted ICANN and Internic. Maybe we can help each other

I just trasfered a large number of domains to GoDaddy but I have problems with these 2 domains:
PONTEREGGAETON.COM
TODOANGELES.COM
I already disabled whois protection and unlocked but Registerfly System does not take the change, I try to enable and then disable, but still the change is not taken.
Take a look at current whois status
http://who.godaddy.com/WhoIs.aspx?domain=todoangeles.com&prog_id=godaddy
http://who.godaddy.com/WhoIs.aspx?domain=pontereggaeton.com&prog_id=godaddy

Last month I was charged for domain renewals that registerfly did not renew, I am desperate to get my domains out I dont want to loose them.

Please reply ASAP to esteban@efiro.com

Esteban
h8fly Registered | 2007-03-05 02:17:05
I hope all this is true so that we can safely have our domains back to us.
Marion - Brave New World Registered | 2007-03-05 02:58:50
ICANN has in effect established a way to prevent Rogue Registrars and Rogue Resellers from using Domain Names to manhandle and extort money and/or business from domain name owners. Hopefully, this system will be made PERMANENT and all domain name owners will be able to file a complaint with ICANN and have disputed domain names put into "MAINTANENCE MODE" (i.e., do not expire, do not go into redemption and do not delete).

The Next System that needs to be put into place by ICANN is a way to cancel the registration on domain names that went back into the available pool due to mistake and/or malice on the part of a Registrar or Reseller.

I noticed before this post that the .org Registry(PIR) appeared to have put all of Registerfly's .org domain names into a "do not delete status". PIR also provided me with authorization codes for my .org domain names at Registerfly.

PIR is 1000 times more responsive to domain name holders than any other Registry Manager. When I complained to Registry Managers about Verio and Melbourne IT back in 2004, PIR was THE ONLY REGISTRY MANAGER to contact Verio and demand an explanation from Verio and Melbourne IT on why Verio was unilaterally changing WHOIS data on domain names without any judgements or court orders (or according the domain name owners with any due process of any kind).

Before this Registerfly Scandal, I watched 200 of my domain names expire and go back into the available pool because Verio unilterally changed the WHOIS data on the domain names and then deliberately let the domain names expire. Verio knew that once the domain names went back into the available pool, it would be next to impossible for me to recover the domain names even if I won a federal lawsuit against Verio charging Verio with being a Racketeering Enterprise.

How is Registerfly a Rogue Registrar and Verio is not a Rogue Reseller? The Registrar Melbourne IT is Verio's partner and Melbourne IT's ICANN accreditation should have been revoked by ICANN a long time ago.

There is a Racketeering Enterprise in the Domain Name Registration Business and it is not Registerfly.
Marion - Cancel Registrations Registered | 2007-03-05 03:04:12
It seems to me that ICANN need only modify the Registrars agreements to give ICANN the authority to cancel the registrations on domain names that went back into the available pool due to mistake or malice on the part of a registrar or reseller.

As things currently stand, people in the business of registering expired domain names KNOW that WIPO does NOT consider malice on the part of a Registrar or Reseller as sufficient reason to award a domain name back to its original owner
regme Registered | 2007-03-05 03:59:37
I am still skeptical - it's like the "boy who cried wolf", and we have the taste of a sh#t sandwich fresh in our mouths.

http://fight-registerfly-fraud.bravehost.com/
Slackjaw Registered | 2007-03-05 06:05:30
Too little too late for me. Domain is lost unless I go into arbitration with the organization that has it now.
ajmurphy1 Registered | 2007-03-05 06:08:00
The actions of RegisterFly caused a lot more damage then just causing people to loose domain names. RegisterFly also cost their customers (you and me) valuable and billable client time & productivity, our reputations with our customers, and the permanent loss of many of our customers as they canceled their contracts with us and moved on to do business with our competitors out of frustration that we weren’t providing the services that we promised. As we sit helplessly with our domains being held hostage by RegisterFly, many of us have watched in despair as one client after another has walked out the door and taken our income along with them. Many of us are out of business because of RegisterFly. But, from reading posts here on this site, it appears that pretty much everyone will be perfectly happy and rosy cheeked, as long as they just get their domain names back. I guess all I can do is just sit here and shake my head, because I am just amazed at how much is being completely overlooked by most everyone on here. There is much, much more to the big picture here then just the domain names that were, or might still be lost. Money was stolen, money was extorted, credit card fraud was openly and flagrantly perpetrated, we were lied to time and time again, and our time was deliberately stolen from us and wasted. This was done to thousands and thousands of RegisterFly customers, and, again, people have lost their entire businesses and livelihoods because of this. No one seems to say much of anything about this though. It’s like no one cares and everyone will be happy if the only thing that happens is that everyone gets their names back and a few rules get changed so it can’t happen again. So the rest of us, who lost even more then domain names are just casualties of war then, swept under the carpet and forgotten about?.
flytrap - Would ICANN have step in... Registered | 2007-03-05 07:56:05
...if RF had paid them regularly? From ICANN announcements it seems that they delayed action until their fees were not paid. So this is the message other registrars are getting. All is well while you pay ICANN's share. I'll say it again:

My conclusions are:

1. ICANN has allowed the domain industry to become playground for sharks, vultures... and flies.

2. According to their rules of the game, what is happening is nobody's fault but the customer's.
savant Registered | 2007-03-05 17:47:51
Flies...I like it. I'm going to now refer to any registrar scum as "flies" from now on.
gearedup Registered | 2007-03-05 07:18:43
This is good, but what about those of us who have been locked out of our control panel with R/Fly and have no access to our auth codes at all?

Does anyone know if provisions are being made or plans being implemented for situations like this?
KinderKitz - re: Registered | 2007-03-05 09:26:31
ajmurphy1 wrote:
There is much, much more to the big picture here then just the domain names that were, or might still be lost. Money was stolen, money was extorted, credit card fraud was openly and flagrantly perpetrated, we were lied to time and time again, and our time was deliberately stolen from us and wasted. This was done to thousands and thousands of RegisterFly customers, and, again, people have lost their entire businesses and livelyhoods because of this. No one seems to say much of anything about this though. It’s like no one cares and everyone will be happy if the only thing that happens is that everyone gets their names back and a few rules get changed so it can’t happen again. So the rest of us, who lost even more then domain names are just casualties of war then, swept under the carpet and forgotten about?.


I have been comparatively fortunate to this point but coming very close to losing 3 domains. They are those ones that keep producing the error: "Domain Not Found". Was able to transfer everything else out. I emailed Icann, Verisign, & Internic requesting them to override RF and initiate transfers for those three domains on March 1. I included screen shots of the whole works. Got a reply from Mike Zupke & Verisign referring me back to Registerfly.

Nonetheless, in spite of the carnage to customers and their families that has transpired to date, I am sincerly surprised to hear any of the principal shareholders are still breathing. Are they????? Their level of self serving, malicious, and maniacal behaiviour is nothing short of a death wish! With every decision comes a measure of risk. Amazingly enough, they did not sense a fatal level of risk. That speaks volumns as to the perceived accountability of the industry! There did not appear to be any at least to that point!

A couple of punks with nothing to loose have ruined thousands of lives. There is no justice for that. They have nothing and never will until they steal again. Extinguishing the desease will prevent their impact in the future but will not give us back the past. Icann will probably hide in a plethora, thats another word for a bunch, of jargon and bylaws than govern their exsistance. But in the end, they were the doctors assigned to the task of managing the flesh eating desease. They knew about it but did not amputate before lives were lost! This is a malpractice suit!

So what of the flesh eating desease? I was invited to and accepted full responsibilty of my customer's destiny on the web. I am not sure that I have the resolve for patience, due diligence, and the rest of that suit and tie bull s*%t if my domains expire. I am so so so sorry for all the pain endured by so many innocent people and families here.

Justice will never be served. Bureaucracy is filled with cowards. Its not really their fault I guess cause there are just so many convenient places to hide, take refuge, or just get lost. Trouble is the cowards find their way to the money all time.
ultra - re: Registered | 2007-03-05 09:22:51
ajmurphy1 wrote:
RegisterFly also cost their customers (you and me) valuable and billable client time and productivity, our reputations with our customers, and the permanent loss of many of our customers

I think there are many, just as frustrated as you and me, but perhaps only a tiny minority have actually found there's a problem, so far, or found this site.

Yes, I know that if there are 900,000 customers, that's going to mean each month some 75,000 might have domains due for renewal, but some might not expire for another year or two or five... so those people might be sailing along happily with no knowledge of problems.


ajmurphy1 wrote:
... But, from reading posts here on this site, it appears that pretty much everyone will be perfectly happy and rosy cheeked, as long as they just get their domain names back.


I think it will hit some people much harder than others, and just that there may be a number (like me) thinking, wish to heck I had kept at least a year before expiry, not left it to renewal time. As it happens, I am fairly lucky as some of mine won't expire for 6+ months, including my business domain... But I have some 70-80 domains and of those 30-40 will soon be "in limbo", some have already expired, some not.

ajmurphy1 wrote:

It’s like no one cares and everyone will be happy if the only thing that happens is that everyone gets their names back and a few rules get changed so it can’t happen again. So the rest of us, who lost even more then domain names are just casualties of war then, swept under the carpet and forgotten about?


Not at all, but individual circumstances mean that the only thing in common is the loss of the domain name, everything else in terms of business chaos is variable, and while you have my sympathy, there's nothing much I can do, and remember lots of users just have a domain as a personal thing, so it's a minor inconvenience, not making them bankrupt.

Every case is different, and if you're massively disadvantaged then there must be consumer bodies and so on that may be able to assist, but they're not integral to domain name chaos caused by RF, and subsequent discussions here, so not really a topic I'd expect (or want) to dominate.
sjwitz - Article Registered | 2007-03-05 10:24:04
FYI only, the above report is repeated here (see last two paragraphs)--

http://www.cbronline.com/article_news.asp?guid=80D83445-B5D5-47BC-B74D-D70EA124D72B

I concur with those who have said "too little/too late," since many domains were lost already...
doramail - ICANN should streamline Web In Registered | 2007-03-05 11:12:53
ICANN should issue some unified guidelines to all registrars which should be capable to have a streamlined strategy on web interface of domain registration and management. Most of the troubles are caused by the tricky development of the web applications which block the freedom of the user.

For eg, Go Daddy's domain registration and management application is very very tricky.

Try to register an INFO domain for 10 year with GD and you will be charged $93.40 instead of $12.4 (1.24 per year)

Whenever you make any changes in your Domain's Contact Details with GoDaddy, you will be compelled to Agree on a NO Transfer agreement for certain period. (30 or 60 days!)

By default, GD's registration of domains are for 2 years. Only vigilant techies will click on the options to edit it for 1 year.

Registerfly Advantage

We shouldn't forget the fact that Registerfly was offering us the best interface and endless options blended with one of the lowest charges in the industry. Unlike, GoDaddy or eNOM, RF provided it without much hidden charges Registerfly was offering us a 30 days grace period for renewals of domains!

I still have 15 domains with Registerfly and 12 of them are free to move. I wish to keep them with Registerfly, if they are back to business in 1 month time.

Finally, I admire the technical skills of Kevin Medina, if he was the only one who hard coded RF's web interface. Hope he can depart from his evil thoughts and use his technical skills to build a new life! I already lost 8 domains and 2 are under the threat of collapse due to Protect Fly factor. Hope things will get better with RF.
aj.doyle Registered | 2007-03-05 11:51:21
Is this going to count for domains that were transferred to enom as well? I am in RGP with enom and I can't do anything about it at the present time.

I really hope those of us that reached out for the enom rope to save us don't end up kicking ourselves in our collective asses for hurting our cause more than helping it.

My problems with Enom (Reads from bottom up):
www.artemiscain.com/Registerfly.pdf
Marion - Cyber 911 Registered | 2007-03-05 12:19:17
The FIRST warning shot that the domain name system was vulnerable to terrorism and malicious acts was the hijacking of the domain name panix.com by a Melbourne IT reseller. THIS fact demonstrated to terrorists around the world that they need only become a Melbourne IT reseller in order to disrupt the US Economy more than Al Queda did on 9/11.

The Second Warning Shot that the domain name sytem was vulnerable was Federal Judge Barbara S Jones' inaction on a federal RICO lawsuit against Verio in New York (and the failure of the US Justice Department to pursue a criminal RICO action against Verio).

Verio openly admitted to unilaterally altering whois data on domain names, seizing those domain names and then either letting the domain names expire or selling domain names (as Verio/Melbourne IT did with the domain names domesticpartners.com and domesticpartners.net).

Verio's lawyer, J Alexander Lawrence of Morrison Foerster, sworn in an affidavit that ( a ) Verio believes that it has a right to unilaterally change whois data and to seize domain names without court orders or judgments and to either sell those seized domain names or to let them expire; and ( b ) Verio intends to continue to unilaterally alter whois data and will continue to seize domain names without cour orders or judgments whenever Verio desired.

Verio DESTROYED the businesses of hundreds of real estate agents around the country when Verio simply changed the whois data on the domain names the real estate agents were using. Verio then changed the nameservers on the seized domain names redirecting them away from the real estate agent's webites to Verio's website.

Federal Judge Barbara S Jones in New York did not see any need to appoint counsel for Verio's victims nor to refer this matter to the US Justice Department and the Department of Homeland Security.

The Registerfly Fly Scandal was made possible due to ICANN and The US Department of Homeland Security past INACTION against rogue resellers like Verio and rogue registrars like Melbourne IT. If ICANN and put procedured into place to protect domain name owners from Verio and Melbourne IT, The Registerfly Scandal would never have happened.

Registerfly is a US based company with US Officers. Verio is a money losing business controlled by a foreign government and Melbourne IT is a rogue registrar based in Australia. Melbourne IT's position is that you have to go to Australia to sue Melbourne IT.
Samson - Cyber nut! Registered | 2007-03-05 15:37:40
Christ. You just don't give up on this ridiculous Al Qaeda thing do you!

Your credibility is in the toilet. You sound worse than liberals wailing about the vast right wing conspiracy crap.
flytrap - Interesting: Registered | 2007-03-05 12:45:05
Is ICANN Liable for Failing to Rescind Registerfly's Accreditation?

http://tcattorney.typepad.com/anticybersquatting_consum/2007/03/is_icann_liable.html
dsmj - LIES - FAILURE TO RENEW Registered | 2007-03-05 13:11:28
www.Witnessconsultants.com
expired after renewal attempts, on 3/4/07

its is now an expirefly linkfarm page

Domain Name: WITNESSCONSULTANTS.COM
Registrar: REGISTERFLY.COM, INC.
Whois Server: whois.registerfly.com
Referral URL: http://www.registerfly.com
Name Server: DNS1.EXPIREFLY.COM
Name Server: DNS2.EXPIREFLY.COM
Status: clientTransferProhibited
Status: clientUpdateProhibited
Updated Date: 05-mar-2007
Creation Date: 04-mar-2005
Expiration Date: 04-mar-2008


Yet anopther registerfly case study in failure to renew, failure to communicate.
Kyanar Registered | 2007-03-06 20:45:56
Actually it's worse. Look at the expiration date (one year from now). They DID renew it, but they altered all the registration details on it. For the time being even ICANN can't block that.
nevoomer Registered | 2007-03-05 13:27:46
my domain shechters.com also stolen by them
I paid for renew and he doesnt work
they changed all domain info to their info
i dont know what to do... the AUTH CODE is blank
Marion - No One Is Liable Registered | 2007-03-05 13:27:53
Every registrar, reseller and web hosting provider I know of have claused in their contracts limiting their liability for lost domain names and down website time. It think if your business is destroyed because a registrar/reseller/webhoster let your domain name get re-registered by someone else, you are only entitled to the $9.99 or so you paid for the domain name.

Also, The US Government/DOD/National Security Agencies are not going to allow any lawsuits to tie up ICANN and ICANN resellers because thse parties are too much a part of the the US National Security operations. The DOD initially opposed the sell of Verio to the Japanese Government on National Security grounds.

Registrars have the the US goverment over a barrel and they know it. There will be no criminal actions taken by the US Government agaisnt Verio. There may be some half-hearted lawsuit by the Justice Department against a little company like Registerfly but, the big name national and offshore Registrars Like Melbourne IT are ABOVE US LAW.

ALSO, it has not been firmly established in all courts in the US who is the actualy owner of domain names. Verio, for one, is claiming that it is the legal owner of the domain names Verio customers register with Melbourne IT.
gelo - re: ICANN should streamline We Registered | 2007-03-05 16:07:04
doramail wrote:


For eg, Go Daddy's domain registration and management application is very very tricky.


Hey I agree with that! When I was searching for a new registrar the first thing I did was going to GoDaddy website. After about 1 hour of surfing and clicking I got an impression that they take their customers and potential customers for plain idiots. All those tricky marketing strategies are so unprofessional (though I'm pretty sure there're enough people who fall for them). Also when you just want to buy or renew a domain name they try to sell you everything on this planet. Quite annoying to struggle with their interface in order to get only what you want. I have no idea why they're so popular. Well maybe most of people ARE idiots That's a pity about Registerfly. Except bad customer support they were the best in the industry.
registerflynomore - re: re: ICANN should streamlin Registered | 2007-03-05 17:15:06
"That's a pity about Registerfly. Except bad customer support they were the best in the industry."

You were kidding when you said that, right? Best in the industry? Exactly what part of Registerfly is the best in the industry?
designisaverb - OMG domain deleted!!! WHAT DO Registered | 2007-03-05 18:32:15
my domain has been deleted from my Registerfly account. www.designisaverb.com They would not let me renew it. I even have a $8.99 as a balance in my account. But they would not let me renew or transfer it. And now it is gone an deleted it. And now some other server has a hold of it.

the policy even said I had 15 days. it'e expired on Feb 28. and I paid on feb 20th.

!@#$! WHAT DO I DO NOW? HELP!!!!
captainproton - Re: OMG domain deleted!!! WHAT Registered | 2007-03-05 19:54:01
If you have screenshots of your account showing that name in there, enom *may* be able to help. Read all the forum posts cconcerning enom

Other than that, you may have to ride out the storm and hope ICANN does the right thing and shut RF down. ICANN has to otherwise they will lose any shreds of credibility that they had left and a mob calling for a replacement.

Take comfort in knowing that it should not be deleted with this latest announcement. So you may have to hold tight. There are a bunch of us in the same boart.
domaincroc.com - ICANN HEEDED THE ADVISE! Registered | 2007-03-05 19:34:00
REREAD:
FEDERAL INTERVENTION - OVERSIGHT NEEDED - 2007/02/23 108

It is welcomed that they stepped to the forefront and have taken the role of protecting our intellectual properties as well as their position in this industry.

I for one want to see each and every domain name saved for it's rightful owner. Nothing less should be tolerated.

As I stated before, a 90 day grace period should be given the original owner to accept ownership of the domain(s) again, or let it/them go.

No one else should determine this.

I do want to mention that resolving these issues for each and every domain owner quickly, is imperative to stay a court case where compensatory damages, as well as major (Millions) punitive damages can be avoided.

There are major entities [Those in oversight; registrars; resellers; etc.] that most likely would have been included. This situation should never be allowed to happen again.

It is imperative that safeguards be put into place for the protection of each domain owner.

This is a wake-up call for the industry. Vigilance by ICANN and each one of us will need to continue so that we can have the peace of mind to continue using this technology.


DomainCroc
Kieren McCarthy - ICANN response Registered | 2007-03-05 20:21:16
Hi, I am ICANN's general manager for public participation.

In recognition of the fact that RegisterFly customers are having trouble getting access to information about their domains, ICANN has posted an update today on the RegisterFly situation on its blog at http://blog.icann.org.

We will endeavour to provide regular updates on the situation, so please do keep checking the site. You can sign up to the blog's RSS feed at http://blog.icann.org/?feed=rss2.
mgama - already expired domains Registered | 2007-03-05 22:52:25
ICANN, great. What about all the domains that already expired?
Stanley Registered | 2007-03-05 23:58:42
Will NOT Allow Domains to Expire

That's a load of crap...I had another domain just expire *03-mar-2008* that is now a name-services.com parking page.
markk - GoDaddy is Tricky???? Registered | 2007-03-06 01:54:43
I moved (not from RF unfortunately) and registered some domains on GoDaddy. Their process is not tricky and management is not tricky either. Their screens are cluttered, but you can't fault a company for trying to upsale their product. That is done every where.
doramail - About GoDaddy Registered | 2007-03-06 05:07:04
Would you please comment on my posting? It's all about the live experience someone face with GoDaddy.

http://registerflies.com/component/option,com_joomlaboard/Itemid,71/func,view/id,1564/catid,21/
TOPEND Registered | 2007-03-06 10:45:01
Well, that isnt coving January and February domains that EXPIRED. I called ICANN to see how I can get these domains back, transfered or at least frozen. There reply. 'Thats between you and register fly.'

also I see on ICANNs blog as of yesterday they say 'and taking legal action against Registerfly in federal court for copies of their databases containing customer data.'

So whats the deal? Have they or have they NOT gotten the data and frozen the domains yet?


.. anyone else seeing a problem here?

Kyanar - re: Brave New World Registered | 2007-03-06 20:42:37
Marion wrote:
PIR is 1000 times more responsive to domain name holders than any other Registry Manager. When I complained to Registry Managers about Verio and Melbourne IT back in 2004, PIR was THE ONLY REGISTRY MANAGER to contact Verio and demand an explanation from Verio and Melbourne IT on why Verio was unilaterally changing WHOIS data on domain names without any judgements or court orders (or according the domain name owners with any due process of any kind).

Before this Registerfly Scandal, I watched 200 of my domain names expire and go back into the available pool because Verio unilterally changed the WHOIS data on the domain names and then deliberately let the domain names expire. Verio knew that once the domain names went back into the available pool, it would be next to impossible for me to recover the domain names even if I won a federal lawsuit against Verio charging Verio with being a Racketeering Enterprise.

How is Registerfly a Rogue Registrar and Verio is not a Rogue Reseller? The Registrar Melbourne IT is Verio's partner and Melbourne IT's ICANN accreditation should have been revoked by ICANN a long time ago.

There is a Racketeering Enterprise in the Domain Name Registration Business and it is not Registerfly.
Marion, give it up. We're all so sick of hearing about how evil Melbourne IT is. Incidentally, how do you propose ICANN revoke the accreditation of one of the ccTLD root registries (Melbourne IT)? No really, do tell how ICANN could revoke a root registry's accreditation.

It's not a conspiracy, and they are not out to get you. Perhaps they should be though.
kimvette - CHANGE YOUR RF PASSWORD Editor | 2007-03-07 13:05:27
RegisterFly.COM has been wrestled away from Kevin and is back in RegisterFly, Inc's hands however Kevin put up a copy of the site on registerfly.net.

With that, he has full access to your usernames, passwords, and everything else.

He cannot muck around with RegisterFly, Inc's back end any longer, does not have access to their financials, bank accounts, or any other resources, but with your login credentials he can log in as any user, change the WHOIS, transfer your domains away, and resell them on the open market.

While the arbitration forum can assist you in getting the domains back it can be an expensive process should you need to get attorneys involved.

Please, CHANGE YOUR REGISTERFLY.COM PASSWORD IMMEDIATELY!!!
a101 Registered | 2007-03-07 14:39:19
How do you know that Kimvette?

Registerfly.net has been registered since 2000 ...
LOOK at the status ...
Someone should HIJACK it!!! LOL ...

Domain name: registerfly.net
Registrant Contact:
UnifiedNames.com
Domain Administrator (domainadmin@unifiednames.com)
973.758.0880
Fax: 973.758.0880
P.O. Box 2418
Livingston, NJ 07039

Administrative Contact:
UnifiedNames.com
Domain Administrator (domainadmin@unifiednames.com)
973.758.0880
Fax: 973.758.0880
P.O. Box 2418
Livingston, NJ 07039

Technical Contact:
UnifiedNames.com
Domain Administrator (domainadmin@unifiednames.com)
973.758.0880
Fax: 973.758.0880
P.O. Box 2418
Livingston, NJ 07039

Status: Active

Name Servers:
dns1.name-services.com
dns2.name-services.com
dns3.name-services.com
dns4.name-services.com
dns5.name-services.com

Status: ok
Updated Date: 08-feb-2007
Creation Date: 16-sep-2000
Expiration Date: 16-sep-2008

.
realarts - Who Can Assist Me IP:82.128.1.64 | 2007-03-23 07:30:28
I currently have about 55 names with registerfly and i just discovered that I would not be able to manage the names.

Can any one help me as I want to transfer these names to my new registrar.

Thank you.
gearedup Registered | 2007-04-04 11:07:17
ICANN reportedly told the registries that any of Registerfly Domains will NOT be allowed to expire, go into redemption, or be deleted during the next 30-35 days.



............ Funny.... I have one expired and one in Redemption....

Who is overseeing THIS policy? Or is it simply more promises with holes in the bottom?
Only registered users can write comments!
 
< Prev   Next >